!!! CASE STUDY: VIBE CODING SECURITY !!!
← Back to Homepage

Vibe Coding Security

LIVE Securing the Vibe-Coding Workflow

Source: vibe-coding-security
Website: https://pranava0x0.github.io/vibe-coding-security/


Background

The question I set out to answer: How do I keep moving fast with AI coding tools without quietly introducing security holes into my own projects?

I vibe-code a lot (small tools, dashboards, side quests), and the workflow has changed the threat model. The old contract was that a human read the README, picked the dependency, and ran npm install. The new one is an agent half-remembering a package and installing it on its own, often with permission prompts skipped. That is exactly how leaked credentials, self-replicating supply-chain worms (Shai-Hulud), malicious MCP servers (the Postmark MCP that BCC'd every email), and prompt-injection campaigns get in, and most people find out weeks later, when the cloud bill arrives. So I built a living tracker of the incidents that actually matter to people shipping with Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, v0, Bolt, and Replit, paired with recovery playbooks and prevention guides, so the gap between "compromised" and "noticed" is hours instead of weeks.

How It Works

I vibe-coded it (fittingly), then spent most of the effort hardening it. It's a security resource, so it has to hold up to the same scrutiny it asks of everything else. The build is deliberately low-maintenance and keeps running on its own:

[View the Live Tracker] | [View the Code]

A Look Inside

Each view shown on mobile and desktop — tap any image to open the live site.

A single scannable alerts feed, newest first (mobile) A single scannable alerts feed, newest first (desktop)
A single scannable alerts feed, newest first — each entry links through to a full, dated advisory.
The advisory index: one file per incident (mobile) The advisory index: one file per incident (desktop)
The advisory index: one file per incident, tagged by severity and status.

← Back to Homepage