EL26-72-000 · 2026-06-22 · Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc. submits Request for Issuance of an Errata re the Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date re ISO New England Inc. et al
Back to sections and commentaryPDF page 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
ISO New England Inc.
Central Maine Power Company
The Connecticut Light and Power Company
Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company
Green Mountain Power Corporation
Maine Electric Power Company
The Narragansett Electric Company
New England Power Company
New Hampshire Transmission, LLC
NSTAR Electric Company
Public Service Company of New Hampshire
The United Illuminating Company
Unitil Energy Systems, Inc.
Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc.
Vermont Transco LLC
Versant Power
Docket No.
EL26-72-000
VERMONT ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ERRATA
To the Commission:
On June 18, 2026, the Commission issued its “Order Instituting Proceeding Under
Section 206 of the Federal Power Act” in this above captioned proceeding.1 In its Order,
the Commission found that ISO New England’s (“ISO-NE”) existing Transmission,
Markets and Services Tariff (“Tariff”) appears to be unjust, unreasonable, or unduly
discriminatory or preferential and thereafter directed ISO-NE and sixteen (16) Participating
1 ISO New England Inc., et al, 195 FERC ¶ 61,215 (June 18, 2026)(the “Order”).
PDF page 2
2
Transmission Owners (“PTOs”) within ISO-NE to show cause with respect to a variety of
concerns related to large load or co-located load transmission and interconnection within
sixty (60) days of the date of its Order.2 Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc. (“VEC”) is a
member owned electric distribution utility that provides safe, affordable, and reliable
energy services to over 33,000 members in 75 communities. VEC has identified an issue
with the Order and respectfully requests that the Commission issue an errata as soon as
practicable at this early stage of the proceeding.
At the onset, VEC desires to make crystal clear that it does not challenge the need
for the Commission to boldly address the important national issue of service to large load
and co-located load within organized markets and elsewhere. VEC further acknowledges
Commission precedent with respect to non-jurisdictional entities with certain rate
schedules within a jurisdictional RTO or ISO. VEC’s request is purely procedural.
The Commission lists VEC as one of the PTOs in the caption of the Order. But at
footnote 10 of the Order, describing which PTOs it intended to include in the caption, the
Commission made clear:
Participating Transmission Owners refers to the entities listed
in the caption of this order. We recognize that ISO-NE’s
transmission owners include entities that are not subject to the
Commission’s jurisdiction because they are not public utilities
pursuant to section 201(f) of the FPA. See 16 U.S.C. § 824(f);
Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 180 FERC ¶ 61,022, at PP 44-45 (2022).
Accordingly, the Commission has not included Town of
Braintree Electric Light Department; Chicopee Municipal
2 Id. at P 2.
PDF page 3
3
Lighting Plant; Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy
Cooperative; Connecticut Transmission Municipal Electric
Energy Cooperative; The City of Holyoke Gas and Electric
Department; Town of Hudson Light and Power Department;
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company; Town
of Middleborough Gas & Electric Department; New
Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc.; Town of Norwood
Municipal Light Department; Town of Reading Municipal
Light Department; Shrewsbury Electric and Cable Operations;
Town of Stowe Electric Department; Taunton Municipal
Lighting Plant; Vermont Public Power Supply Authority; and
Town of Wallingford, CT, Department of Public Utilities,
Electric Division here as Participating Transmission Owners
that must respond to this order to show cause. Nonetheless, the
Commission retains the authority to review each entity’s
formula rates as a component of ISO-NE’s Tariff in an order
to show cause directed towards ISO-NE, and ISO-NE must
respond to this order regarding the non-public utilities’ ISO-
NE Tariff provisions on file with the Commission. See Sw.
Power Pool, Inc., 180 FERC ¶ 61,022 at P 40.[3]
Like each of the other PTO entities listed in footnote 10, VEC is a not a public utility
pursuant to section 201(f) of the FPA. In 2006, VEC informed the Commission that as a
result of the passage of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, it ceased to be a public utility on
August 8, 2005 because the changes to the Federal Power Act effective as of that date
exempted electric cooperatives that sell less than four (4) million megawatt hours annually.
At the time of the change in law, VEC sold approximately 500,000 megawatt hours. The
Commission subsequently acknowledged VEC’s acceptance of its withdrawal of
jurisdictional rate schedules based on the change in law.4
3 Id. at fn 10.
4 Vermont Electric Cooperative, Docket No. ER06-959 et al., (unpublished letter order dated July 6,
2006).
PDF page 4
4
Twenty years later, VEC is still well under the established statutory four (4) million
megawatt hour threshold. To be sure, VEC is a PTO within ISO-NE but it is a PTO that is
similarly situated to all of the other of the non-jurisdictional entities listed in footnote 10
of the Order. VEC respectfully submits that it is unaware of any basis, stated within the
Order or any facts external to the Order, to treat VEC any different. VEC believes that the
Order inadvertently identified it based on its legacy status as a public utility.
Further. VEC believes the Commission did not intend to include it as a named
respondent because in the Show Cause Order issued to the California Independent System
Operator, Inc. and its transmission owners in Docket No. EL26-71-000, non-jurisdictional
entities were purposefully included as respondents.5 However, in that order, the
Commission made clear in footnote 9 that it included each of the non-jurisdictional entities
as respondents “because their Transmission Owner Tariffs on file with the Commission
detail the wholesale load interconnection process in CAISO.”6 The Commission continued,
“[i]f a non-public utility wishes to be removed from this proceeding, we will rescind the
show cause order against them at their request, and we expect CAISO to respond to this
order regarding the non-public utility’s CAISO Tariff provisions on file with the
Commission.”7 The Commission did not express a similar concern with respect to ISO-
NE’s non-jurisdictional transmission owners.
5 Cal. Indep Sys. Op, Inc., et al, 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026)(the “CAISO Order”)
6 Id. at fn. 9.
7 Id., citing Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 180 FERC ¶ 61,022, at P 40 (2022).
PDF page 5
5
An errata to the Order affecting ISO-NE would not impact or diminish the
Commission’s stated show cause goals whatsoever; the Commission’s interests are in
modification of the terms and conditions of the ISO-NE Tariff. Based on these facts, VEC
respectfully requests that the Commission issue an errata to the Order that
(1) removes VEC from the caption of Docket No. EL26-72-000, which intended
to identify only ISO-NE and jurisdictional PTOs; and
(2) adds VEC in the list of non-jurisdictional PTO entities in footnote 10.
To the extent the Commission determines the requested correction exceeds the
scope of an errata, VEC respectfully requests in the alternative that the Commission issue
a clarification that rescinds the Order with respect to VEC as described in the CAISO Order
precedent set out above.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Craig W. Silverstein
Craig W. Silverstein
March Counsel LLC
2001 L Street NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 640-2100
craig.silverstein@marchcounsel.com
Counsel for Vermont Electric Cooperative,
Inc.
Dated: June 22, 2026PDF page 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of June 2026, I have served a copy of the
foregoing document on the official service list compiled by the Office of the Secretary for
the above-referenced proceeding.
/s/ Craig W. Silverstein