EL26-67-000 · 2026-07-22 · Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Motion to Rescind Show Cause Order of Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc
Back to sections and commentaryPDF page 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL26-67-000
AEP Appalachian Transmission Company, Inc.
AEP Indiana Michigan Transmission Company, Inc.
AEP Kentucky Transmission Company, Inc.
AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc.
AEP West Virginia Transmission Company, Inc.
Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
American Transmission Systems, Incorporated
Appalachian Power Company
Atlantic City Electric Company
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company
Commonwealth Edison Company
Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.
Dayton Power and Light Company
Delmarva Power & Light Company
Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc.
Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.
Duquesne Light Company
Essential Power Rock Springs, LLC
Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC
Indiana Michigan Power Company
Jersey Central Power & Light Company
Kentucky Power Company
Keystone Appalachian Transmission Company
Kingsport Power Company
Linden VFT, LLC
Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission, LLC
Monongahela Power Company
Neptune Regional Transmission System, LLC
NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic Indiana, Inc.
Ohio Power Company
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative
PECO Energy Company
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
The Potomac Edison Company
Potomac Electric Power Company
Public Service Electric and Gas Company
Rockland Electric Company
PDF page 2
2
Silver Run Electric, LLC
Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company
Transource West Virginia, LLC
UGI Utilities, Inc.
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc.
Wheeling Power Company
MOTION TO RESCIND SHOW CAUSE ORDER AS TO
ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
Pursuant to Rule 212 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure,1 Allegheny
Electric Cooperative, Inc. (“Allegheny”) hereby submits this motion to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) to rescind the show cause order (“PJM
Show Cause Order”)2 directed to Allegheny and issued on June 18, 2026, in the above captioned
proceeding.
I.
DESCRIPTION OF ALLEGHENY
Allegheny, the owner of transmission facilities turned over to the operational control of
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”) and thus a PJM transmission owner (“PJM TO”), is a
non-profit electric generation and transmission cooperative (“G&T Cooperative”) corporation,
incorporated under the Electric Cooperative Law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It is
the exclusive wholesale supplier of its 14 electric distribution cooperative members located in
Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Like other G&T Cooperatives, Allegheny is owned entirely by
its members. Each of Allegheny’s members either receives financing under the Rural
Electrification Act of 1936 or sells less than 4 million megawatt hours of electricity per year.
1
18 C.F.R. § 385.212 (2026).
2
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (“PJM Show Cause Order”).
PDF page 3
3
For this reason, Allegheny is not a public utility subject to FERC jurisdiction, pursuant to
Section 201(f) of the Federal Power Act.3
II.
RELEVANT BACKGROUND
On June 18, 2026, the Commission issued the PJM Show Cause Order, thereby initiating
a proceeding under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act. The PJM Show Cause Order found
that PJM’s Open Access Transmission Tariff (“Tariff”) appears to be unjust, unreasonable, or
unduly discriminatory or preferential for failure to include specific provisions addressing the
interconnection of data centers, manufacturing facilities, and other large energy users.4 The
PJM Show Cause Order directed PJM and certain of the PJM TOs either to explain how the
Tariff remains just and reasonable without specific provisions for the interconnection of large
load or to develop such provisions.5
On the same day, the Commission initiated similar Federal Power Act Section 206 show
cause proceedings against five other regional transmission organizations/independent system
operators (“RTOs/ISOs”) and their transmission owners.6
III.
JUSTIFICATION FOR RESCISSION
The Commission directed the PJM Show Cause Order to PJM and to those PJM TOs that
are public utilities, and it expressed an intention to exempt those PJM TOs that are not subject to
FERC jurisdiction.7 The Commission specifically indicated that it did not address the PJM
Show Cause Order to the following PJM TOs because they are not public utilities pursuant to
Section 201(f) of the Federal Power Act: AMP Transmission, LLC; City of Cleveland,
3
16 U.S.C. § 824(f) (2026).
4
195 FERC ¶ 61,211 at P 3.
5
Id.
6
See, e.g., Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (“CAISO Show Cause Order”).
7
195 FERC ¶ 61,211 at P 3, n.13.
PDF page 4
4
Department of Public Utilities, Division of Cleveland Public Power; City of Hamilton, Ohio;
East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.; and Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc.8
The Commission, however, noted that it retains the authority to review each of these entities’
tariff provisions as a component of PJM’s Tariff in an order to show cause directed towards
PJM, and it also noted that PJM is obliged to respond regarding these entities’ tariff provisions.9
As demonstrated above, Allegheny is not a public utility pursuant to Section 201(f) of
the Federal Power Act. Accordingly, like each of the PJM TOs that the Commission identified
as non-public utilities, Allegheny should have been exempted from the PJM Show Cause Order.
Allegheny believes that the Show Cause Order directed to it was issued in error. In requesting
rescission of the Show Cause Order as to it, Allegheny acknowledges the Commission’s
authority to review the Allegheny-specific provisions of the Tariff and pledges to cooperate with
PJM, to the extent that PJM requests assistance from Allegheny, in crafting its response.
Allegheny submits this request for recission consistent with the Commission’s guidance
to transmission owners that are not subject to its jurisdiction located in other ISO/RTO regions.
For instance, the Commission directed the CAISO Show Cause Order to CAISO transmission
owners that are not public utilities despite their non-jurisdictional status “because their
Transmission Owner Tariffs on file with the Commission detail the wholesale load
interconnection process in CAISO.”10 The Commission advised that, “[i]f a non-public utility
wishes to be removed from this proceeding, we will rescind the show cause order against them
at their request . . ..”11 Allegheny’s motion for rescission is thus consistent with this guidance.
8
Id.
9
Id. (citing Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 180 FERC ¶ 61,022 at P 40 (2022)).
10 CAISO Show Cause Order, 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 at P 2, n.9. For the record, the Allegheny-specific
portions of the PJM Tariff do not include interconnection processes or policies.
11 Id.
PDF page 5
5
IV.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons indicated above, Allegheny respectfully requests that the Commission
rescind the PJM Show Cause Order against it, as a non-public utility, and asks that the
Commission waive any notice and comment periods that might be applicable to this motion.
Dated: July 22, 2026
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Joshua E. Adrian
Joshua E. Adrian
Thompson Coburn, LLP
1909 K Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 585-6922
Attorney for Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
PDF page 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this day caused the foregoing document to be served on the
official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of July, 2026.
/s/ Joshua E. Adrian
Joshua E. Adrian
Thompson Coburn, LLP
1909 K Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20426
(202) 525-6922