Motion for Leave to Answer and Answer of Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers et al. to the Joint Protest of the Sierra Club et al
Read topic-matched comments in ER26-3650
Topics in the text: Cost allocation · Registry access · Filing procedure
Responses and related views
No section-specific public response is linked for this document.
Source sections
Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.
Opening text
opening text · Topic match: Registry access
ER26-3650-000 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER PROTESTS AND ANSWER OF THE LARGE ENERGY USERS Pursuant to Rules 212 and 213 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC” or “Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure,1 the Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers (“CMTC), the Illinois Industrial…Read this passage
I. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER
printed heading
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER The Large Energy Users respectfully request leave to file this Answer.Read this passage
II. ANSWER
printed heading
II.Read this passage
A. MISO’s Grandfathering/Transition Proposal is Just and Reasonable and
printed heading
MISO’s Grandfathering/Transition Proposal is Just and Reasonable and Consistent with the June 18, 2026 Show Cause Order’s Objective to Protect Existing Commercial Arrangements.Read this passage
B. The Public Interest Organizations and Consumer Interest Advocates Have
printed heading
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (“NERC”) has highlighted numerous reliability challenges presented by emerging Large Loads, and electrical characteristics of computational loads specifically.9 The PIOs accurately discuss the Commission’s cost-causation principle10 and assert…Read this passage
C. Concerns about Cost Shifting Risk among Transmission Customers are More
printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation
The Large Energy Users appreciate the cost shifting and transparency concerns raised by the PIOs and Consumer Interest Advocates; however, these concerns are more appropriately addressed in a future filing specifically focused on cost shifting risk among transmission customers.Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation
D. MISO’s Proposal Reflects Feedback Provided During the Stakeholder
printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation
ER26-3650-000, at 2-4, 8-9, 22; see also Prepared Direct Testimony of Beibei Li at 22:18-23:5, 34:12-39:22 (detailing the various stakeholder meetings, workshops, and feedback requests since 2024). 16 See, e.g., Sw.Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation
III. CONCLUSION & REQUEST FOR RELIEF
printed heading
CONCLUSION & REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers, the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, the NIPSCO Large Customer Group, the Louisiana Energy Users Group, and the Texas Industrial Energy Consumers…Read this passage
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
printed heading
Dated this 2nd day of October 2026. /s/ Victoria A.Read this passage