Topics in the text: Filing procedure · Cost allocation · Reliability and curtailment
Corporate Energy Buyers Association · Direct response
CEBA backed the California parties’ requests for 90 more days. It argued that testing proposals with stakeholders before filing could improve their commercial viability and legal durability.
PDF pp. 1–2Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.
opening text · Topic match: Filing procedure
EL26-71-000 MOTION FOR ABEYANCE Pursuant to Rule 212 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) respectfully submits this motion to hold the instant proceeding in abeyance for 90 days from the…Read this passage
printed heading
I.Read this passage
printed heading · Topic match: Filing procedure
The Commission emphasized that it would not grant such abeyances reflexively, that any abeyance will be limited to 90 days, and that 4 it would look with great disfavor toward requests to extend the abeyance period.4 The Commission anticipated that successful abeyance requests will include both (1)…Read this passage
printed heading · Topic match: Filing procedure
The CAISO respectfully requests that the Commission hold the Section 206 proceeding initiated with the Order to Show Cause in abeyance for 90 days while the CAISO and its Participating Transmission Owners develop their respective Section 205 filings to address Commission’s preliminary findings.Read this passage
printed heading
III.Read this passage
printed heading · Topic match: Filing procedure
Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the CAISO respectfully requests that the Commission grant the CAISO’s motion for abeyance in this proceeding.Read this passage
printed heading
Dated at Folsom, CA this 3rd day of August, 2026. /s/ Jacqueline Meredith Jacqueline Meredith An employee of the California ISORead this passage