EL26-67-000 · 2026-07-08 · MAVEN SOLUTIONS

Comments of Maven Solutions on the Show Cause Order regarding Civic Bankability Rating Standard to FERC's Five Reform Categories

Read topic-matched comments in EL26-67

Topics in the text: Cost allocation · Reliability and curtailment · Registry access

Responses and related views

No section-specific public response is linked for this document.

Source sections

Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.

Opening text

opening text

1 of 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Read this passage

TABLE OF CONTENTS

printed heading

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Read this passage

I. Introduction and Statement of Interest

printed heading

I.
Read this passage

II. Executive Summary

printed heading

II.
Read this passage

III. Record Background: The PJM System in Documented Distress

printed heading

Record Background: The PJM System in Documented Distress
Read this passage

IV. Methodology: The Civic Bankability Rating Standard

printed heading

Methodology: The Civic Bankability Rating Standard
Read this passage

V. Analysis Against FERC's Five Reform Categories

printed heading

V.
Read this passage

VI. CBRS Findings for PJM

printed heading

VI.
Read this passage

VII. Recommendations to the Commission

printed heading

VII.
Read this passage

VIII. Companion Filings and Stage 2 Supplement Notice

printed heading

VIII.
Read this passage

IX. Conclusion

printed heading

IX.
Read this passage

X. Sources and Notes

printed heading

X.
Read this passage

I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF INTEREST

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Founded in 2014, Maven has developed the Civic Bankability Rating Standard (“CBRS”), a statute-grounded scoring methodology for evaluating large-load and data-center projects against the ratepayer, reliability, community-cost, and financial-surety exposures they generate.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HEADLINE FINDING PJM's current tariff posture on large-load interconnection scores CONDITIONAL under the Civic Bankability Rating Standard with two active keystone flags — Ratepayer Protection (FERC Category 2) and Financial Surety (FERC Category 4).
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

III. RECORD BACKGROUND: THE PJM SYSTEM IN

printed heading

RECORD BACKGROUND: THE PJM SYSTEM IN DOCUMENTED DISTRESS
Read this passage

A. Emergency Authorities in Force

printed heading

Emergency Authorities in Force On May 18, 2026, the U.S.
Read this passage

B. Capacity Market Trajectory

printed heading

Capacity Market Trajectory PJM Base Residual Auction (“BRA”) clearing prices have followed the trajectory shown below.4 Delivery Year Clearing Price ($/MW-day) Notes 2024/25 $28.92 Baseline 2025/26 $269.92 Single-auction increase 2026/27 $329.17 Constrained by PA/PJM settlement cap 2027/28 $333.44…
Read this passage

C. The 2027/28 Footprint Shortfall

printed heading

The 2027/28 Footprint Shortfall PJM has reported that the 2027/28 BRA was the first RPM auction since the Reliability Pricing Model was created in 2007 that did not meet the reliability requirement.
Read this passage

D. July 1–3, 2026 Emergency Event

printed heading · Topic match: Reliability and curtailment

PJM also warned utilities to prepare for possible curtailment of data centers and other large loads to backup generation, but reported that the action was ultimately not required.7 The event was contemporaneous with the intervention window for these Show Cause Comments.
Read this passage Filed comments: Reliability and curtailment

E. Estimated Ratepayer Impact

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Estimated Ratepayer Impact The Natural Resources Defense Council has estimated that data-center-driven load growth could impose up to $163 billion in additional PJM consumer costs through 2033, with average household impacts reaching approximately $70 per month by 2028.9 Monitoring Analytics has…
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

F. Companion Proceedings

printed heading

Companion Proceedings The Commission's Show Cause Order in this docket is one of six issued on June 18, 2026, splitting the underlying rulemaking record from Docket No.
Read this passage

IV. METHODOLOGY: THE CIVIC BANKABILITY RATING

printed heading

METHODOLOGY: THE CIVIC BANKABILITY RATING STANDARD
Read this passage

A. Overview of CBRS

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Overview of CBRS The Civic Bankability Rating Standard is a statute-grounded scoring methodology Maven Solutions has developed for evaluating large-load and data-center projects against ratepayer, reliability, community-cost, and financial-surety exposures.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

B. Jurisdictional Application to Commission Proceedings

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Maven applies to Commission proceedings a jurisdiction-relevant subset consisting of four dimensions: Ratepayer Protection, Transparency, Co-Location and Interconnection Governance, and Financial Surety.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

C. Mapping the Jurisdictional Subset to FERC's Five Reform Categories

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Reform Focus Primary CBRS Dimension 1 Efficient transmission service application and study processes Transparency 2 Preventing cost shifting; requiring transparency Ratepayer Protection — 8 of 16 KEYSTONE 3 Co-location and behind-the-meter generation Co-Location & Interconnection Governance 4 New…
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

V. ANALYSIS AGAINST FERC'S FIVE REFORM CATEGORIES

printed heading

V.
Read this passage

A. Category (1) — Efficient Transmission Service Application and Study

printed heading

Category (1) — Efficient Transmission Service Application and Study Processes Primary CBRS Dimension: Transparency Score: 2 of 5 — Conditional.
Read this passage

B. Category (2) — Preventing Cost Shifting and Requiring Transparency

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Category (2) — Preventing Cost Shifting and Requiring Transparency Primary CBRS Dimension: Ratepayer Protection — KEYSTONE FLAG ACTIVE Score: 1 of 5 — below the CBRS Acceptable threshold.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

C. Category (3) — Accommodating Co-Location and Behind-the-Meter

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

The posture recognizes co-location as a service class but does not yet include measurable reliability-hold-harmless mechanisms, financial surety instruments backing switching-event ratepayer exposure, or reciprocity provisions between co-located generation and the load it serves. 10 of 16
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

D. Category (4) — New Transmission Services for Flexible Large Loads

printed heading

Category (4) — New Transmission Services for Flexible Large Loads Primary CBRS Dimension: Financial Surety — KEYSTONE FLAG ACTIVE Score: 2 of 5 — Conditional.
Read this passage

E. Category (5) — Process to Study Generation Serving Electrically

printed heading · Topic match: Connecting load and generation

The study process for such 11 of 16 generation currently proceeds on the same footing as unconstrained generation interconnection, which does not account for the specific service-and-cost relationship between the generation and the co-located load it primarily serves.
Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation

VI. CBRS FINDINGS FOR PJM

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

CBRS Dimension Applied Raw Score Keystone? 1 Transparency (primary) 2 / 5 — 2 Ratepayer Protection 1 / 5 KEYSTONE FLAG 3 Co-Location & Interconnection Governance 2 / 5 — 4 Financial Surety 2 / 5 KEYSTONE FLAG 5 Transparency (secondary axis) 2 / 5 — Total Four unique dimensions applied 9 / 20 TWO…
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

VII. RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COMMISSION

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Recommendation 3 — Category (3): Co-Location and BTMG Reliability and Ratepayer-Hold- Harmless Any co-location or behind-the-meter generation tariff provisions adopted in Category (3) should be consistent with the Commission's dispositions in PJM's parallel co-location and BTMG compliance…
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

VIII. COMPANION FILINGS AND STAGE 2 SUPPLEMENT

printed heading

COMPANION FILINGS AND STAGE 2 SUPPLEMENT NOTICE These Comments are one of six substantive Comments Maven Solutions files in the six Show Cause dockets initiated on June 18, 2026 (Dockets EL26-67 through EL26-72).
Read this passage

IX. CONCLUSION

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Maven respectfully requests that the Commission require PJM to submit tariff revisions or, in the alternative, a detailed evidentiary showing that addresses each of the five categories consistent with the recommendations set out herein.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

X. SOURCES AND NOTES

printed heading · Topic match: Reliability and curtailment

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., post-event operations reporting on the July 1–3, 2026 heat event, including preliminary July 2, 2026 instantaneous load of approximately 162,700 MW after demand- response activation and reporting on the utility warning regarding possible curtailment of data centers and…
Read this passage Filed comments: Reliability and curtailment