The Indicated PJM Transmission Owners submit Request for Clarification, or in the Alternative, Rehearing of the 06/18/2026 Order
Read topic-matched comments in EL26-67
Topics in the text: Filing procedure · Connecting load and generation · Cost allocation
Responses and related views
No section-specific public response is linked for this document.
Source sections
Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.
Opening text
opening text · Topic match: Filing procedure
RM26-4-000 (issued Oct. 27, 2025). 7 PJM Show Cause Order at PP 3, 35. 8 All capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the PJM Tariff. 9 PJM Show Cause Order at PP 3, 35. 3 Commission directed PJM either to justify the absence of such provisions or…Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation
I. requests for CLARIFICATION AND rehearing
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Filing procedure
REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION AND REHEARINGRead this passage
A. Statement of Issues and Specification of Errors
PDF bookmark
Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983) (an agency “must examine the relevant data and articulate a satisfactory explanation for its action including a ‘rational connection between the facts found and the choice made’”) (citation omitted) (“State Farm”); Consol.Read this passage
B. Arguments
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Filing procedure
The PJM Show Cause Order fails to justify a conclusion that the proposed large load definition requires that every customer meeting the definition of large load must be offered the same services under the same rates, terms and conditions.13 To the contrary, requiring a one-size- fits all approach…Read this passage
2. The Commission Should Clarify That “Large Load” and “Electrically Proximate Large Load” Need not be Defined Based on the Point of Interconnection.
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
Any determination that a large load customer or electrically proximate large load customer must be defined based only on reference to the point of interconnection is therefore not based on reasoned decision-making and is not supported by substantial evidence. 19 See 30-Day Compliance Filing at 3 &…Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation
II. Conclusion
PDF bookmark
II.Read this passage
CONCLUSION
printed heading · Topic match: Filing procedure
CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the PJM Transmission Owners respectfully request that the Commission grant rehearing of the PJM Show Cause Order for the reasons set forth herein, or, alternatively, clarify the Order as set forth in Section I.Read this passage
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
printed heading
Dated at Washington, D.C., this 20th day of July 2026. /s/ Deiman Flores Deiman Flores Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1301 K Street NW Suite 500 East Washington, DC 20005Read this passage