Motion for Leave to Answer and Answer of Central Municipal Power Agency Services, et al. to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.’s 10/13/2026 Motion for Leave to Answer and Answer
Read topic-matched comments in ER26-3650
Topics in the text: Registry access
Responses and related views
No section-specific public response is linked for this document.
Source sections
Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.
Opening text
opening text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.Read this passage
I. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER
printed heading
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure prohibit answers to answers unless otherwise authorized by the Commission,6 but the Commission has authority to waive this prohibition for good cause.7 The Commission has found good cause to waive the general prohibition on…Read this passage
II. Answer
PDF bookmark
II.Read this passage
A. Further clarity is needed to ensure that MISO’s proposed Interconnection Reliability Requirements are limited to Transmission System-connected Large Loads.
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Registry access
Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212, P 58 (2026) (“MISO Show Cause Order”). 14 See Midwest TDUs Comments at 6-7. 15 MISO Answer at 27 (emphasis added). 16 MISO Show Cause Order P 58. 17 The Computational Load registry criteria discussed in Midwest TDUs’ Comments at 9 n.22 (quoting the proposed…Read this passage
B. There remains uncertainty as to how Transmission Customers can rely on their agreements with Large Loads to effectuate compliance.
PDF bookmark
MISO states that it “must be able to obtain, through the Transmission Customer, all information and operational access necessary” and that agreements can “establish[] the Transmission Customer’s access to the information needed for 18 MISO Answer at 28. 19 Midwest TDUs Comments at 9-15. 20 MISO…Read this passage
CONCLUSION
printed heading
CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed above, and in Midwest TDUs’ Comments, the Commission should ensure that the issues above are adequately clarified by MISO and order further Tariff revisions to the extent that MISO’s proposed language is not clear on these issues.Read this passage
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
printed heading
Dated on this 28th day of October, 2026. /s/ Jeffrey M.Read this passage