Read topic-matched comments in ER26-3552
Topics in the text: Connecting load and generation · Filing procedure · Reliability and curtailment
Co-location · PDF pp. 10–16
The generation and load must use the same connection point or a withdrawal point at the same substation and voltage. The agreement does not buy transmission service for the load.
ZG Interconnection Service is not Transmission Service and does not exempt a Transmission Customer from procuring Transmission Service. PDF p. 12Filed comments: Connecting load and generation
Capacity accreditation · PDF pp. 16–22
MISO specified where a load-serving entity could use capacity credits associated with a zero-injection resource. It separately proposed penalties if those resources participate as behind-the-meter generation.
all ZRCs associated with a ZG Resource must be used as part of an LSE’s FRAP or RBDC Opt Out PDF p. 20
Queue eligibility · PDF pp. 27–39
MISO proposed a 90-day study and would bar changes to the request after submission. It argued that changes would disrupt the study timetable for other customers.
prohibit modifications to ZG Interconnection Requests after submission PDF p. 34
Organization of MISO States · Direct response
OMS conditionally supported the zero-injection agreement. It wanted enforceable limits on a generator exporting power and asked MISO to explain how paired loads and generators would count in capacity and reliability calculations during outages.
PDF pp. 3–5, 9Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Open a heading to read the original passage.