Read topic-matched comments in EL26-67
Topics in the text: Filing procedure · Connecting load and generation · Cost allocation
Constellation Energy Generation · Direct response
Constellation supported a partial delay but said PJM’s separate duty to comply with the co-location order could not depend on the outcome of the large-load process.
PDF pp. 2–3Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.
opening text · Topic match: Filing procedure
This development, however, must be done in conjunction with PJM’s already ongoing efforts to implement changes directed by the Order on Rehearing, Clarification, Compliance Filing, and Paper Hearing (“Compliance Order”) in the PJM Co-Located Load proceeding. 4 Many of the changes contemplated in…Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation
PDF bookmark
I.Read this passage
printed heading
BACKGROUNDRead this passage
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Cost allocation
Large Load Order The Large Load Order is an important component of the Commission’s ongoing efforts to efficiently and cost effectively integrate large loads with the transmission system.7 The Large Load Order found that several aspects of PJM’s Tariff appeared unjust and unreasonable due to the…Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
Co-Located Load Proceeding Also on June 18, 2026, the Commission issued the Compliance Order in the PJM Co-Located Load proceeding.15 The Compliance Order accepted most of PJM’s proposed Tariff changes, but directed that PJM make a number of additional changes within sixty days.16 Among other…Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
Third, the Compliance Order directed PJM to revise the Tariff to provide additional detail regarding the operational requirements and necessary control technologies to be employed for customers taking new transmission services on behalf of Eligible Load.25 Similarly, the Large Load Order directed…Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
Among other things, PJM’s intended FPA section 205 filing will advance a proposal that delivers faster and more flexible processes that also: (1) achieve efficient transmission service application and study processes, including through the consideration of alternative transmission technologies; (2)…Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Filing procedure
MOTION TO HOLD PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE PJM respectfully requests the Commission hold this proceeding in abeyance for ninety days to allow PJM adequate time to develop a section 205 filing to respond to the 29 Donnie Bielak, Show Cause Order for Large Loads Conceptual Approach: Co-Located Load Order…Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Filing procedure
REQUEST FOR SHORTENED ANSWER PERIOD AND EXPEDITED TREATMENT PJM respectfully requests that the Commission shorten the answer period for this motion to five days and grant expedited treatment to issue an order ruling on the abeyance motion within ten days, by August 6, 2026.Read this passage
PDF bookmark
IV.Read this passage
printed heading · Topic match: Filing procedure
Porter Craig Glazer Vice President – Federal Government Policy PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 1200 G Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 423-4743 (202) 393-7741 craig.glazer@pjm.com Wendy B.Read this passage
printed heading
Dated at Washington, D.C., this 28th day of July 2026. /s/ Ruth M.Read this passage