Google: reject LARS with guidance, or accept and suspend it until the cost agreement arrives.
the Commission should either reject LARS with guidance indicating that it needs to be filed concurrently with procedures to prevent cross-subsidization or, in the alternative, accept and suspend the proposal PDF p. 3
LARS and the queue use different assumptions, so both can claim the same headroom.
each process is based on an incomplete snapshot of the transmission system and how it will operate in practice, which increases the likelihood that the LARS and DPP processes will produce incompatible results. PDF p. 6
Google wants independent generators to have direct access, with FERC resolving disputes with the utility.
protections providing that all forms of generation, including independent generation, have nondiscriminatory, direct access to the expedited generation interconnection study process under LARS. PDF p. 9
MISO says independent generators can negotiate before applying
Midcontinent Independent System Operator · Direct response
MISO said the transmission customer submits an application for an already matched pair. It argued that an independent generator remains free to bring a proposal to that customer before the application, and that the eligibility rules are nondiscretionary.
Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.
Opening text
opening text · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
In addition, MISO must also continue to refine and improve its principal interconnection process, the Definitive Planning Phase (“DPP”), so that all generation resources in MISO—not 8 Id. at 14. -4- just those paired with large loads—can interconnect on a reasonable timeline.
A. The LARS Proposal Opens the Door to Shifting the Costs of Serving LARS Pairs onto Other Customers and Future MTEP Cycles
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
That is particularly so given that LARS’s design creates the very real risk of overallocation because ongoing DPP cycles do not include LARS requests and the LARS studies do not include DPP projects before they have signed Generator Interconnection Agreements.19 As a result, each process is based…
B. Without the Pro Forma Cost Shifting Agreement, the Commission Cannot Find LARS Just and Reasonable
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
It could reject the LARS proposal outright with direction to MISO that if it refiles LARS it must contain adequate protections against cost shifting, including any pro forma agreement.
PDF bookmark · Topic match: Connecting load and generation
Under MISO’s proposal, LARS applications must be submitted through a designated LARS Associated Transmission Customer, which MISO indicates is typically the LSE.
Dated: October 23, 2026 Washington, D.C. /s/ Bryan Shpall Bryan Shpall Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 1700 K Street NW Fifth Floor Washington, DC 20006