ER26-3515: the filed comments
These passages match a topic and a request or argument in the same sentence. A filing can quote another party. Read its page before attributing a position.
Cost allocation
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-09-03
Instead, as it is currently set forth in the proposed tariff, adoption of PJM’s curtailment compensation proposal would impede states’ ability to enforce any NLL’s commitment to protect ratepayers from the costs that the NLL is causing. PDF p. 6
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-09-03
This mechanism will protect ratepayers from bearing capacity costs that should rightfully be borne by new large loads or otherwise bearing excessive and unnecessary capacity costs associated with phantom load projections. PDF p. 10
Filing procedure
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-08-28
3 PJM has authorized OPSI to represent that PJM does not oppose this Motion for Extension of Time. PDF p. 1
ER26-3515-001 · 2026-11-09
ER26-3515-000 REQUEST FOR REHEARING TO PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY FOR OHIO CONSUMERS BY OFFICE OF THE OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL I. PDF p. 3
Registry access
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-09-03
1 PA PUC supports the creation and maintenance of a New Large Load (NLL) Registry and suggests improvements to the Registry. PDF p. 2
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-09-03
In addition, the Commission should direct modification of the proposal to require its review and validation of data supplied for the Large Load Registry, and to expand access to the information in the Registry such that the JCA can review the data. PDF p. 2
ER26-3515-001 · 2026-11-09
7 never explains why state consumer advocate offices should be excluded from access to this information despite the demonstrated need for such access. PDF p. 9
Reliability and curtailment
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-09-03
However, PA PUC objects to the proposed, red- lined tariffed language at PJM’s Transmittal Appendix A at page 105 - X (Compensation for Providing Interim Resource Adequacy Service), which conflicts with averments in PJM’s Transmittal Letter at pages 106-107. PDF p. 2
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-09-03
7 The Commission should reject PJM’s treatment of IRAS as a compensable resource adequacy service, and instead direct PJM to modify the proposal to provide that new large loads that do not self-supply must take non-firm transmission service. PDF p. 2
Retail and wholesale authority
ER26-3515-000 · 2026-09-03
Aside from the clear retail rate consequences that state regulators could be powerless to prevent, states would not be empowered to ensure that the rate was justified under the tariff. PDF p. 5