Microreactor Opportunity Map

Case study · Infrastructure

A cited microreactor market guide: buyers and instruments, proposed sites, customer power costs, vendors, utility filings and the conditions needed to close a deal.

Stack
Static HTML/CSS/JS, no framework; a multi-agent research pipeline gated by a citation-lock test suite.
Status
LIVE
Dates
Reviewed October 2, 2026; data dates shown in the app
Links
Live site · Source code

Background

Which buyers have moved toward a microreactor purchase, and what would make the deal work?

The market guide separates named buyer instruments from general expressions of interest. Proposed sites, vendor milestones, customer power costs and utility filings provide different evidence about whether a sale can close.

The latest site adds remote-region applications and utility-filing context alongside its deals, costs, vendors and rule changes. Published cost estimates, signed prices and proposed comparators retain their different evidence types.

Screenshots

Select a screenshot to enlarge it.

The Home tab distinguishes binding buyer instruments (mobile) The Home tab distinguishes binding buyer instruments (desktop)
The Home tab distinguishes binding buyer instruments, proposed sites, delivery targets and utility filings, then routes readers to the market evidence.
The Deals tab: 16 named buyers across three tracks (mobile) The Deals tab: 16 named buyers across three tracks (desktop)
The Deals tab: 16 named buyers across three tracks — U.S. government, international, and U.S. commercial — each with its load class and how far it has moved toward a signed instrument.
The Customer cost sub-tab separates signed contracts (mobile) The Customer cost sub-tab separates signed contracts (desktop)
The Customer cost sub-tab separates signed contracts, awards, rate orders and proposed comparators, with a source and unit for every cost.

Features

Reviewed October 2, 2026 · Project documentation.

[View the Live Map] | [View the Code]


← Back to Homepage